Why Should We Ratify the New Constitution?

Ninth Edition: New Constitution The new Constitution comes up under the url http://politicallogic101.blogspot.com/2016/05/ratify-constitution-into-positive-law.html

#1: Campaign Finance Reform:

     People are allowed to provide campaign contributions in order to better express their opinions in the public arena; however, they may not use campaign finance at ANY level of government to get access to public funds, the current scandal of corruption happening now.

#2: Advertising:

     Freedom of speech is limited to "historical" and "physical" realities, and freedom of the press is limited to "condemning the actions of any level of government," so porn and deceit may be prohibited.

#3: Freedom of Religion:

     "Religion" is finally defined! Public funds may not be used to advance theocracy, and people are allowed to follow religious laws if they do not contradict the Constitution (there are no laws against the love of God in this Constitution).

#4: "Fairness":

     Punishments must be "proportional to the crime," but slavery isn't used but for "the most atrocious crimes," and punishments mustn't be "cruel and unusual" as always.

#5: Judicial activism:

     Judges and Justices do not have those positions if they say that the Constitution says anything other than what it says, (a way to protect the Constitution).

#6: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms:

     Given the lack of information for people on how to keep and bear arms safely, and given that that 2nd amendment currently exists with no limit, we need a way to clarify it, and to put a limit on it in terms of if there is enough of a guard in an area to stop a murderer in their tracks, but to protect the students and teachers, we have no choice but to teach them everything there is to know about weaponry, or at least not prohibit it. And to give more people a reason to be in the military, protect the people who sacrifice their lives for us, and get guns to the people who can use them the best, we are prohibiting any limitation on the right to keep and bear arms for current and ex-soldiers.

#7: The Replaceability of Congress Members, Voting:

     We are also preventing elitism without causing the undue harm which term limits entail. No one, and I mean no one, can be prevented from learning policy-making skills. Who can vote is now properly defined for the first time EVER, and Representatives are now no longer bound by geography, and electors can have fractions of votes according to population, one elector is actually elected and the other two have one vote and are bound by how the state votes. In the most extreme cases, where the electorate is unconscionably divided, we can have multiple Presidents.

#8: We kind of have to…

     Part of Article I of the Constitution states that States must pay their debts in SILVER and GOLD… yes, you heard that right! Currently, one lawsuit could find that the reason states are prevented from doing this is the lack of silver and gold among their constituents, which can all be tied back to the U.S. government seizing everyone's gold, and can also implicate the Federal Reserve and every dollar that exists… you probably are getting what I am saying… under the current Constitution, one lawsuit  could harm the safety of the United States' government as an institution…
     There is also the fact that we may have a slight Constitutional crisis if Hillary Clinton were elected, given that Article II only says "he" never "she," which is averted if this new Constitution were ratified.

#9: Taxes and Debt:

     Direct taxes (income tax) will be but one kind of progressive tax rate: the rate asymptotes at 50% (as in none will ever have to pay that much no matter how close they get to that level), and we are using the natural log of your income divided by ~16 (or more as Congress directs), so you won't pay 49.9% tax at $100 income. Debt may only be taken on by a unanimous agreement in Congress, which has happened often, though it goes underreported.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Least Controversial Amendment

Resolved by the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United States (Two-thirds of both houses concurring therein) to have the following become an amendment to the Constitution when ratified by 3/4ths of the States. Section 1 All legislative chambers except for the Senate, shall only be considered to have passed a bill when the requisite majority as their current or future rules would have it, but under this amendment, that of their full membership shall have certified their support of the bill. Furthermore, this certification may be in the form of a faxed signature on an identical copy of the bill given while not present in the chamber, or in a similar secure fashion as technological advance permits. Furthermore, no one except for the clerk of that chamber shall be required to be present in order for business to proceed as usual provided that members communicate with each other with reasonably secure technology. No part of Section 1 applies to the Senate. Section 2 A
Read more

Amendment to Reduce Frivolous Litigation by Democratic Means

As a matter of policy, it is not good for people to be able to sue businesses for offenses 40% of Americans don't think are offenses because that means both that our laws are undemocratic and that businesses are not going to hire people or perform services they needlessly think they could be sued over in the future. This amendment is the only way to solve the problem because courts are bound to precedent and cannot rule a civil law unconstitutional on the grounds that the majority of people think the law is unwise or callous. The American people have more than enough authority that, when a rule is presented to them in clear terms, they can say whether it should be true or false. This ballot must be given in English, even if some American citizens can't understand it, because the Constitution and all laws and court opinions they could look up to determine why it is an issue are also written in English, and those need a chance of being understood. The Supreme Court can be consid
Read more

Tenth Edition: New Constitution

Superlative Constitution SECTION 1 (Definitions) For the purposes of all Constitutions for the United States of America, there are some basic definitions (“==” means a test of reality to the bindings of law): “T” means True “F” means False “S” means Senator(s) or consent of Senators “R” means Representative(s) or consent of Representatives “P” means President or a Presidential Order or a Presidential appointment “O” means Federal Officer or a regulation they come up with “vP” means Vice President or their power of recognition “Ppro tempore” means the President Pro Tempore or their power of recognition “HS” means the Speaker of the House or their power of recognition “” means a certain phrase in either these Constitutional procedures or a certain law provision that is either allowed by this Constitution (True) or prohibited by this Constitution (False). “<A>” means “for all,” or the universal quantifier, when put next to an item it means “all of (ite
Read more