Syrian Refugee Crisis: Credible Source

Ninth Edition: New Constitution Finding 4:
Surging admissions of Syrian refugees into the United States is likely to result in an increase in federal law enforcement’s counterterrorism caseload.

  • Following the rise in admissions of Iraqi refugees into the United States, it was discovered that two al Qaeda terrorists had managed to slip through the cracks and resettle in Kentucky in 2009.28 The FBI reportedly still has “dozens” of ongoing counterterrorism cases tied to these admissions.29 
  • The Committee has been made aware that officials in multiple departments and agencies are concerned about accelerating Syrian refugee admissions and fear that the lack of caution will result in a range of new terrorism cases domestically. 
  • Given the current high-threat environment, agencies are stretched extremely thin in terms of their ability to monitor suspects and disrupt plots. This year the FBI has been forced to confront nearly a thousand terrorism-related cases in every single U.S. state, according to FBI Director Comey, straining law enforcement resources. “We had to surge hundreds of people from criminal cases—which are important—and move them over to the national security side,” he noted. Comey said he was unsure what the Bureau would do if there was a return to this level of operational tempo.30
From:
https://homeland.house.gov/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/HomelandSecurityCommittee_Syrian_Refugee_Report.pdf
     U.S. Homeland Security Committee, November 2015
Recommedations: (From the same)
1. Immediate action must be taken to temporarily suspend the admission of Syrian refugees into the United States until the nation’s leading intelligence and law enforcement agencies can certify the refugee screening process is adequate to detect individuals with terrorist ties. 
2. The Government Accountability Office should initiate an end-to-end review of the refugee screening and vetting process, with a particular focus on the integrity of the current procedures for conducting national security checks on Syrian refugees. 
3. The President should act immediately to implement the recommendations of the bipartisan Congressional Task Force on Combating Terrorist and Foreign Fighter Travel to enhance America’s security posture to prevent terrorist infiltration into the United States. 
4. The U.S. intelligence community and law enforcement should launch a concerted effort with our European partners to review all data already collected from refugees and migrants—and to screen it against counterterrorism and intelligence databases to find any possible extremist connections. 
5. U.S. government departments and agencies should ramp up efforts to assist our European partners in building the capacity to conduct robust, consistent counterterrorism vetting of refugees and migrants going forward. 
6. U.S. government departments and agencies must also work with European and Middle Eastern partners to close information-sharing gaps and improve intelligence and law enforcement cooperation related to Syrian refugees. 
7. Ultimately, the threat posed by terrorist exploitation of refugee routes can only be addressed at the source through decisive action to roll back and defeat ISIS, to expedite the removal of the Assad regime, and to keep Syria from remaining an Islamist terror safe haven. Accordingly, the President must work with our allies to lay out a credible strategy for victory and long-term stability in Syria.

Their citations:
28 James Gordon Meek et al., “Exclusive: US May Have Let ‘Dozens’ of Terrorists into Country as Refugees,” ABC News, November 20, 2013, http://abcnews.go.com/ Blotter/al-qaeda-kentucky-us-dozens-terrorists-countryrefugees/story?id=20931131. 
29 Ibid. 
30 Worldwide Threats and Homeland Security Challenges, Hearing before the House Homeland Security Committee, House of Representatives, October 21, 2015, 114th Cong., 1st sess., (2015) (Testimony of Hon. James B. Comey, Director, Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice).

Note Well: It is a crime to lie before Congress when you are giving testimony.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Least Controversial Amendment

Resolved by the House of Representatives and the Senate of the United States (Two-thirds of both houses concurring therein) to have the following become an amendment to the Constitution when ratified by 3/4ths of the States. Section 1 All legislative chambers except for the Senate, shall only be considered to have passed a bill when the requisite majority as their current or future rules would have it, but under this amendment, that of their full membership shall have certified their support of the bill. Furthermore, this certification may be in the form of a faxed signature on an identical copy of the bill given while not present in the chamber, or in a similar secure fashion as technological advance permits. Furthermore, no one except for the clerk of that chamber shall be required to be present in order for business to proceed as usual provided that members communicate with each other with reasonably secure technology. No part of Section 1 applies to the Senate. Section 2 A
Read more

Amendment to Reduce Frivolous Litigation by Democratic Means

As a matter of policy, it is not good for people to be able to sue businesses for offenses 40% of Americans don't think are offenses because that means both that our laws are undemocratic and that businesses are not going to hire people or perform services they needlessly think they could be sued over in the future. This amendment is the only way to solve the problem because courts are bound to precedent and cannot rule a civil law unconstitutional on the grounds that the majority of people think the law is unwise or callous. The American people have more than enough authority that, when a rule is presented to them in clear terms, they can say whether it should be true or false. This ballot must be given in English, even if some American citizens can't understand it, because the Constitution and all laws and court opinions they could look up to determine why it is an issue are also written in English, and those need a chance of being understood. The Supreme Court can be consid
Read more

Tenth Edition: New Constitution

Superlative Constitution SECTION 1 (Definitions) For the purposes of all Constitutions for the United States of America, there are some basic definitions (“==” means a test of reality to the bindings of law): “T” means True “F” means False “S” means Senator(s) or consent of Senators “R” means Representative(s) or consent of Representatives “P” means President or a Presidential Order or a Presidential appointment “O” means Federal Officer or a regulation they come up with “vP” means Vice President or their power of recognition “Ppro tempore” means the President Pro Tempore or their power of recognition “HS” means the Speaker of the House or their power of recognition “” means a certain phrase in either these Constitutional procedures or a certain law provision that is either allowed by this Constitution (True) or prohibited by this Constitution (False). “<A>” means “for all,” or the universal quantifier, when put next to an item it means “all of (ite
Read more