Justice Delayed Is Justice Denied

Dear Representative, 

God requires you, as per Amos 5:24 and Isaiah 59:14-16 and 1 Corinthians 5:9-13, to disassociate from among yourselves a sexually immoral man and a slanderer. The process you have for doing that in the law you swore yourselves to is called “Impeachment”. Therefore print copies of H.Res.353 and sign them and deliver those copies to the other Representatives to sign and deliver the signed copies of H.Res.353 to the Senate to have a trial of impeachment. Do not fear a mere human who says that that is not how the process works, as Jesus has spoken: 

“Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.” ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭10‬:‭28‬ ‭NIV‬‬ 

After you accomplish that work, and you no longer worry about his veto, God commands you to get rid of laws and policies that contradict his law, because, as his prophet Isaiah says regarding God’s law: 

“It pleased the Lord for the sake of his righteousness to make his law great and glorious. But this is a people plundered and looted, all of them trapped in pits or hidden away in prisons. They have become plunder, with no one to rescue them; they have been made loot, with no one to say, “Send them back.” Which of you will listen to this or pay close attention in time to come? Who handed Jacob over to become loot, and Israel to the plunderers? Was it not the Lord, against whom we have sinned? For they would not follow his ways; they did not obey his law. So he poured out on them his burning anger, the violence of war. It enveloped them in flames, yet they did not understand; it consumed them, but they did not take it to heart.” ‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭42‬:‭21‬-‭25‬ ‭NIV‬‬ 

Start with these laws: 

“Woe to those who make unjust laws, to those who issue oppressive decrees, to deprive the poor of their rights and withhold justice from the oppressed of my people, making widows their prey and robbing the fatherless. What will you do on the day of reckoning, when disaster comes from afar? To whom will you run for help? Where will you leave your riches? Nothing will remain but to cringe among the captives or fall among the slain. Yet for all this, his anger is not turned away, his hand is still upraised.” ‭‭Isaiah‬ ‭10‬:‭1‬-‭4‬ ‭NIV‬‬ 

And the word of his prophet Amos: 

“There are those who hate the one who upholds justice in court and detest the one who tells the truth. You levy a straw tax on the poor and impose a tax on their grain. Therefore, though you have built stone mansions, you will not live in them; though you have planted lush vineyards, you will not drink their wine.” ‭‭Amos‬ ‭5‬:‭10‬-‭11‬ ‭NIV‬‬ 

Translating that into modern legal terms: 

“The rules of evidence in court are altered. The enforcement of those rules of evidence on witness testimony can only be in the form of telling the jury afterwards that they must exclude sections of the testimony (to be crossed out on paper) when making their decision. Furthermore, a judge cannot block a man who is on trial for murder from saying to the jury that he was ‘just following God’s orders’ on killing someone pursuant to one of God’s laws in Leviticus chapter 20 and the judge cannot block the man from presenting evidence of the victim committing the offense in question. Note: a rule in Leviticus 20 that lacks the words ‘put to death’ can’t be used in a case where the killer alleges ‘I was just following God’s orders.’ Any two jurors in a case can, by raising their hands together after they believe they have heard enough evidence after the start of the second day of a trial, can require the judge to quickly let the two adversaries each have one hour to wrap up their case, and then the judge must give a run-down of what evidence must be excluded from what they heard and saw, and then have jury deliberations start so that the court can operate efficiently. The jurors deciding to end the case early shall not be treated as if the judge had cut off witness testimony early. Obviously, jurors cannot be prosecuted for this decision, just as they cannot be prosecuted for coming to a verdict. (Other than the jurors facing wrath from God in the future if they make the wrong decision under: “Acquitting the guilty and condemning the innocent— the Lord detests them both.” Proverbs‬ ‭17‬:‭15‬‬‬ or: “Do not follow the crowd in doing wrong. When you give testimony in a lawsuit, do not pervert justice by siding with the crowd, and do not show favoritism to a poor person in a lawsuit.” Exodus‬ ‭23‬:‭2‬-‭3‬. Note: given that elected leaders are never God’s chosen rulers (as per Jesus’s words: “You are the ones who justify yourselves in the eyes of others, but God knows your hearts. What people value highly is detestable in God’s sight.” Luke‬ ‭16‬:‭15‬‬‬), to allow any prosecution against a juror is to force a juror to side with what yet another crowd of 12 people would think, and, in fearing those men, that juror would make a decision contrary to God’s decision). 

Appeals court cases must be sped up significantly, as all that should be required is just legal briefs submitted by the two sides of the case plus presenting up to 2 witnesses from each side to be questioned by those judges to whom the case is appealed. If the judges on the appellate court believe that someone in the lower court case broke the law and thus caused someone to be deprived of true justice, then, if that person is a government official, those judges on the appellate court must order that government official’s arrest for a minimum of 30 days, plus time for community service of making amends to the person wronged, if a person who was not a government official broke the law (in the eyes of the appellate court judges), and the person was not a juror, the appellate court judges can throw that person in prison for 30 days, and may recommend charges in a future case against them. The decision of Circuit Courts of Appeal shall be treated as a final decision in a case. 

The jurisdiction of the Supreme Court is changed in every aspect except for their Constitutional original jurisdiction, consistent with the word of God’s prophet Isaiah in his first chapter (emphasis on ‘Learn to do right, seek justice. Defend the oppressed.’), the Supreme Court Justices have a new duty to prosecute and judge members of government who appear in any court anywhere in the United States, and to order their arrests when they take any action that creates oppression. For example, the Supreme Court has a new duty to arrest Immigration Court judges that fail to provide the individuals before them with a trial by a jury of 12 unbiased people as required by the 6th and 7th Amendments. 

Trial by jury is not a waivable right; the 6th Amendment and 7th Amendment protects it for criminal and civil cases respectively. It is a necessary protection (not just for the earthly circumstances of the person before the court, but also for protecting the soul of the judge, and to prevent the logic of “oh, I made a bad decision in the previous case, so God’s going to punish me, so it doesn’t matter what decision I make in the next case” from becoming its own source of oppression and injustice as prophesied by Jesus’s Apostle Paul: “The Spirit clearly says that in later times some will abandon the faith and follow deceiving spirits and things taught by demons. Such teachings come through hypocritical liars, whose consciences have been seared as with a hot iron.” ‭‭1 Timothy‬ ‭4‬:‭1‬-‭2‬). The only reasons for not giving someone a trial by jury is if that person is a member of government where the court needs to act quickly to punish them to stop injustice from spreading, or to stop the breakdown of the chain of command, or to adjudicate claims against someone for their conduct actually seen physically within a court (not including video evidence simply presented in court). The law of Congress authorizing contracts that waive the right to a jury trial or allowing contracts for private arbitration has represented a rejection of God's order on every government that it take actual personal responsibility for carrying out justice, and was always rejected by God.

All tax laws are changed and replaced everywhere in the United States. The taxes owed to the U.S. government are now fixed at 10% of your annual income plus an additional sum of (for each employee or independent contractor or consultant or temporary worker you have ever hired that year where you paid that person less than 4160*(the minimum wage per hour in the United States)) the difference between 4160*(the minimum wage per hour in the United States) and the amount you paid an employee or independent contractor or consultant or temporary worker that year. The tax owed to your state government is 2.5% of the value of all land you own in that state. The tax owed to your local government is 1% of the value of your land within the jurisdiction of that local government, or whatever tax law a majority of voters in that jurisdiction agree to in a referendum where the actual text of that tax law is provided to the voters on that ballot, where such a tax law expires on the date that a new referendum on that local government's taxes is hosted. These taxes must be paid by non-human entities as well (such as corporations and trusts and nonprofits, unless they succeed in their declarative court cases at proving 3 things mentioned in the note after ‘(2)’ in the following law, specifically: ‘prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a random jury in every state where they operate that that entity has overall taken action to benefit poor people and has all their actions following a system of prioritizing helping many people instead of trying to accumulate wealth and that they are not taking actions to increase shareholder value’). 

Legislative, judicial and executive immunity are completely prohibited in new cases brought under this law of ‘Do not make unjust laws. Do not make oppressive decrees.’ Past Supreme Court arguments of needing to presume that state legislators are acting in good faith are false. 

The punishment for making an unjust law or oppressive decree is either the death penalty or imprisonment according to a length of time suitable to the victims of the offense in whatever circumstances a large number of the victims collectively agree to. 

Example offenses against this law: 

(1) Anyone acting in the manner of an agent of government who has a pattern of actions that result in poor people (people who earn less than 50% of the average annual income plus profits of humans living in the United States) losing money or property or freedom or family members (except where the person targeted committed an actual crime as determined by an unbiased jury) is guilty of making an unjust law or an oppressive decree. 

(2) A tax that is imposed in a way that takes more money from a poor person than a rich person (as a percentage of the person’s income) is an unjust law or oppressive decree, and is illegal. Legislators (including executive branch officials acting as legislators) setting up such a tax are guilty of making an unjust law or oppressive decree. Exceptions: specific rich people who make a grand gesture that helps a large number of people can receive exemptions from taxation for themselves and their brothers and the direct male line of their eldest sons (for example, when David son of Jesse killed Goliath, God considered it justified for Saul to give David and his family a permanent tax exemption; the restrictions in the exemption as written are specifically to avoid one good deed creating a new racial group with the expectation of tax exemptions), the only non-human entities (for example, corporations, trusts or nonprofits) that can receive tax exemptions are those which can that year prove beyond a reasonable doubt to a random jury in every state where they operate that that entity has overall taken action to benefit poor people and has all their actions following a system of prioritizing helping many people instead of trying to accumulate wealth and that they are not taking actions to increase shareholder value; during such declarative cases (which must be done in order to prove their right to a tax exemption) the judge presiding over the case must ask the Senator and Representative most known for speaking against corporations making money to choose who the court shall appoint temporarily as the prosecutor in the case trying to disprove the claims of the entity, and the Treasury shall appropriate $1000 per day to those appointed prosecutors for a maximum of five days per trial, by which point the jury must deliberate, and the jury’s decision cannot be appealed (the entity losing any of these cases in one year must pay their taxes on their income by December 31st of the following year). 

(3) A judge who prevents a witness from telling the whole truth as that witness heard and saw is guilty of making an oppressive decree. (This legal example required the above changes to laws on evidence, so a judge taking objection to bad evidence should follow Solomon son of David’s advice and appear wise by holding their tongue until they can cross out all the bad parts of the testimony presented and tell the jury to not consider certain things based on the history of those things being unreliable.)” 

“You are to have the same law for the foreigner and the native-born. I am the Lord your God.” ‭‭Leviticus‬ ‭24‬:‭22‬ ‭NIV‬‬ 

Translated into modern legal language: “All visas and work permits and temporary protected status and green cards are all converted into ‘Permanent Residency’ status, which can only be taken away by a trial by an impartial jury who has sworn to uphold this standard of judgment: ‘Do not judge, or you too will be judged. For in the same way you judge others, you will be judged, and with the measure you use, it will be measured to you. Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother’s eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye? How can you say to your brother, “Let me take the speck out of your eye,” when all the time there is a plank in your own eye? You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother’s eye.’ Matthew‬ ‭7‬:‭1‬-‭5‬ ‭NIV‬‬” 

Following this law on maintaining a balanced budget (particularly considering using the much lower tax above (guided by the prophet Samuel’s words in 1 Samuel 8 of allowing the King to impose taxes of 10% plus slaves (in this case, instead of taking slaves as taxes, imposing taxes based on hiring people for less than what would allow them to eat and pay bills that year) plus some extra stuff (converted for simplicity into just putting down some property taxes for state and local governments))): 

“Do not be one who shakes hands in pledge or puts up security for debts; if you lack the means to pay, your very bed will be snatched from under you.”

‭‭Proverbs‬ ‭22‬:‭26‬-‭27‬ ‭NIV‬‬ 

“This is also why you pay taxes, for the authorities are God’s servants, who give their full time to governing. Give to everyone what you owe them: If you owe taxes, pay taxes; if revenue, then revenue; if respect, then respect; if honor, then honor. Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law.” ‭‭

Romans‬ ‭13‬:‭6‬-‭8 ‭NIV‬‬ 

Translated into action in governance: 

“The U.S. government confesses that it cannot pay back the debts it has outstanding. Instead, each U.S. Treasury bill or bond that remains outstanding will be treated as authorizing the person holding that bill or bond to exercise absolute sovereignty over one square foot of land in the United States for each $1000 face value of a bill or bond that person has. Claiming that piece of land requires having on hand the physical U.S. Treasury bill or bond that has reached its maturity date and is yet unpaid, then go and buy land in the United States from a private landowner, then write onto that bill or bond the exact GPS coordinates of the 1 square foot spot of land that is covered by your own exclusive sovereignty, then send a high resolution picture that shows your deed to that property together with your Treasury bill or bond and that square foot of land you are exercising sovereignty over in U.S.P.S. Mail to the U.S. Treasury Department. The person doing the claiming must be a human being, and the Treasury bill in question must have the name of that particular person clearly visible. At that point, that U.S. Treasury bill or bond cannot be sold anymore. The exercise of absolute sovereignty over that 1 square foot of land ends solely with the death of that person, at which point that debt shall be counted as repaid. 

As for other budgetary concerns: 

The U.S. Treasury Department shall set up a website listing all the current programs of the U.S. government that are funded anywhere in the world (excluding the $400,000 yearly salary of the President, the $176,000 yearly salary of Congress members, the $320,700 yearly salary of judges, and the appropriations of $1000 per day for prosecutors appointed as default adversaries in cases involving a corporation desiring to prove their right to a tax exemption), and shall have the salaries and pensions and maintenance and rent and construction costs and discretionary fund of each of those programs separated within a larger form exposing current expenses for each program separately, and giving a spot next to each account value for a voter to put in a different number (once that voter has logged in using the unique information which shall be given to them in a sealed envelope at a polling station in the next House of Representatives election so that, when they arrive in person and sign in, that unique account number and password will be given to the voter in a physical envelope there at the polling station). Properly logged in voters shall be able to put in new numbers for each program of the U.S. government (putting in new numbers separately for the salaries and for the pensions and for the maintenance and for the rent and for the construction costs and for the discretionary fund of each program), and submit their decision on appropriating all the money collected in taxes by the U.S. government (other than the aforementioned $400,000 Presidential salary, $176,000 member of Congress salary, $320,700 judge salary and $1000 per day appropriations to the prosecutors appointed as default adversaries in cases involving a corporation trying to prove their right to a tax exemption). The median vote for how much funding a program of the U.S. government gets shall be their budget for the next two years (maintaining the separation between salaries and pensions and maintenance and rent and construction and the discretionary fund), where they cannot spend more than that amount within the two years starting September 30th at 11:59 pm of the year following Election Day. Each account thus created shall offer the particular person the right to redo their budget decision up until September 30th of the year following the Election Day, at which point the last budget sent in by that account will be locked as their choice and that account shall be treated as permanently "read-only" within the U.S. Treasury database. Excess envelopes left over at a polling station after the election shall have their numbers registered into a website that the Treasury Department shall activate only on the day after Election Day that offers a space to type in the account number on the outside of one of those envelopes, thus (unless the account was logged into the previous day) voiding that account, preventing a ghost vote submission on the budget."

(Creating a general referendum on the U.S. government budget is consistent with the sovereignty promised to the voting public at the start of the law that members of government swear themselves to (a government built on ‘We the People’), and is consistent with gradually atoning for the massive debt owed to the public by a government that charges higher taxes than God authorized by his prophet Samuel in 1 Samuel 8.)

Consistent with the words of the Apostle Paul mandating dealing with sexual crimes:

"I wrote to you in my letter not to associate with sexually immoral people— not at all meaning the people of this world who are immoral, or the greedy and swindlers, or idolaters. In that case you would have to leave this world. But now I am writing to you that you must not associate with anyone who claims to be a brother or sister but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or slanderer, a drunkard or swindler. Do not even eat with such people. What business is it of mine to judge those outside the church? Are you not to judge those inside? God will judge those outside. Expel the wicked person from among you.” 1 Corinthians 5:9-13

"The law against Bills of Attainder and Ex Post Facto laws in Section 9 of Article I of the Constitution is modified in a small way due to present clear injustice and violation of clear past laws (note: the Supreme Court has declared that declarations of war are legal even though those inherently are Bills that seek the punishment of specific people identified by Congress for past offenses). Specifically, this Bill of Attainder requires the arrest and permanent exile and stripping of citizenship of each military court judge who violated Barrack Obama’s clear order in 2013: ‘Sexual assault is an outrage. It is a crime, and that’s true for society at large… If we find out somebody’s engaging in this stuff, they’ve got to be held accountable: prosecuted, stripped of their positions, court-martialed, fired, dishonorably discharged. Period.’ (Any judge who used the existence of that order by Barrack Obama as a reason to dismiss or overturn a sexual assault case is for that judge to declare war against God, it doesn’t matter what legal arguments that judge has (the common reason cited by those judges was 'unlawful command influence,' where such a judge has obviously forgotten the whole point of giving a man the power over a government, that he is required to punish wrongdoers (1 Peter 2:14)).”